CQRS vs CRUD — what’s the main idea of CQRS?

Deep dive

Expanding on the short answer — what usually matters in practice:

• Context (tags): cqrs, architecture, read-model
• Scaling: what scales horizontally vs vertically, where bottlenecks appear.
• Reliability: retries/circuit breakers/idempotency, observability (logs/metrics/traces).
• Evolution: keep changes cheap (boundaries, contracts, tests).
• Explain the "why", not just the "what" (intuition + consequences).
• Trade-offs: what you gain/lose (time, memory, complexity, risk).
• Edge cases: empty inputs, large inputs, invalid inputs, concurrency.

Examples

A tiny example (an explanation template):

// Example: discuss trade-offs for "cqrs-vs-crud-—-what’s-the-main-idea-of-cqrs?"
function explain() {
  // Start from the core idea:
  // CQRS separates reads (queries) from writes (commands), often with different models optimiz
}

Common pitfalls

• Too generic: no concrete trade-offs or examples.
• Mixing average-case and worst-case (e.g., complexity).
• Ignoring constraints: memory, concurrency, network/disk costs.

Interview follow-ups

• When would you choose an alternative and why?
• What production issues show up and how do you diagnose them?
• How would you test edge cases?