Interview kitsBlog

Your dream job? Lets Git IT.
Interactive technical interview preparation platform designed for modern developers.

XGitHub

Platform

  • Categories

Resources

  • Blog
  • About the app
  • FAQ
  • Feedback

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

© 2026 LetsGit.IT. All rights reserved.

LetsGit.IT/Categories/Databases
Databaseshard

Database Normalization (1NF, 2NF, 3NF)?

Tags
#normalization#database-design#theory
Back to categoryPractice quiz

Answer

Normalization reduces redundancy. 1NF requires atomic columns and no repeating groups. 2NF is 1NF plus every non‑key attribute depends on the whole key. 3NF is 2NF plus no transitive dependencies between non‑key attributes.

Advanced answer

Deep dive

Expanding on the short answer — what usually matters in practice:

  • Context (tags): normalization, database-design, theory
  • Data model and access patterns: dominant queries (read/write ratio, sorting, pagination).
  • Indexes: when they help vs hurt (write amplification, memory).
  • Consistency & transactions: what’s guaranteed and what can bite you.
  • Explain the "why", not just the "what" (intuition + consequences).
  • Trade-offs: what you gain/lose (time, memory, complexity, risk).
  • Edge cases: empty inputs, large inputs, invalid inputs, concurrency.

Examples

A tiny example (query shape):

-- Example: index + query shape
SELECT *
FROM users
WHERE email = '[email protected]'
LIMIT 1;

Common pitfalls

  • Too generic: no concrete trade-offs or examples.
  • Mixing average-case and worst-case (e.g., complexity).
  • Ignoring constraints: memory, concurrency, network/disk costs.

Interview follow-ups

  • When would you choose an alternative and why?
  • What production issues show up and how do you diagnose them?
  • How would you test edge cases?

Related questions

Databases
Normalization vs denormalization — what’s the trade-off?
#normalization#denormalization#schema-design
Architecture
What is the CAP Theorem?
#distributed-systems#theory#consistency