With a regular Job, a child failure cancels the parent and usually the whole scope. With SupervisorJob (supervisor scope), a failing child doesn’t cancel siblings; you handle the failure locally.
Advanced answer
Deep dive
Expanding on the short answer — what usually matters in practice:
Explain the "why", not just the "what" (intuition + consequences).
Trade-offs: what you gain/lose (time, memory, complexity, risk).
Edge cases: empty inputs, large inputs, invalid inputs, concurrency.
Examples
A tiny example (an explanation template):
// Example: discuss trade-offs for "job-vs-supervisorjob-—-how-do-failures-propagate"
function explain() {
// Start from the core idea:
// With a regular Job, a child failure cancels the parent and usually the whole scope. With S
}
Common pitfalls
Too generic: no concrete trade-offs or examples.
Mixing average-case and worst-case (e.g., complexity).