Kruskal vs Prim for MST — how do they differ?

Deep dive

Expanding on the short answer — what usually matters in practice:

• Context (tags): mst, kruskal, prim, graphs, big-o
• Complexity: compare typical operations (average vs worst-case).
• Invariants: what must always hold for correctness.
• When the choice is wrong: production symptoms (latency, GC, cache misses).
• Explain the "why", not just the "what" (intuition + consequences).
• Trade-offs: what you gain/lose (time, memory, complexity, risk).
• Edge cases: empty inputs, large inputs, invalid inputs, concurrency.

Examples

A tiny example (an explanation template):

// Example: discuss trade-offs for "kruskal-vs-prim-for-mst-—-how-do-they-differ?"
function explain() {
  // Start from the core idea:
  // Kruskal sorts edges and adds the smallest ones that don’t create cycles (uses Union-Find).
}

Common pitfalls

• Too generic: no concrete trade-offs or examples.
• Mixing average-case and worst-case (e.g., complexity).
• Ignoring constraints: memory, concurrency, network/disk costs.

Interview follow-ups

• When would you choose an alternative and why?
• What production issues show up and how do you diagnose them?
• How would you test edge cases?